data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fcb0/0fcb03ad0d494de9fc1175dfe405a380aebaaa22" alt=""
His working on the canvases gave me time to finish our taxes - an exceedingly unpleasant task primarily because we were not disciplined this year and didn't pay quarterly taxes so we owe way too much money. A friend of Facebook joked that the alternative unavoidable option might be more fun - death! Well, I don't want to die quite yet, but I sure don't like doing taxes either!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d31c4/d31c46c996d5fe01105dcf504fea37c545776d14" alt=""
Before starting this canvas, I separated my paints into opaques, semi-transparents, and transparents so that I could work only in transparents on this canvas. Here's what that means - paints have different levels of opacity. If you paint only with opaque paints, anything you put on the canvas covers up anything else that's under it pretty much completely - or it'll blend with it if the paint is still dry. If you use transparent paints on top of other paints, the lower layer(s) will shine through. I think that's how the Old Masters painted and what helped them get such lustrous finishes. My teacher Thomas Bosket taught me about this two years ago, but I haven't used the process before because I was too busy simply learning how to spread the paint effectively across the canvas. This time I'm trying to work more conscienciously to see what happens.
I first put an opaque vermillion - what an intense incredible color!!- onto the background, then put a darker alizaron crimson mixed with dioxinine purple over it. That created a wonderful glow with the red showing through but not quite. I didn't blend the top layer perfectly so there's a lot of movement in the background, making it more interesting.
OK, enough blabber - time for me to get back to it! I'll put up another picture at the end of the day today if there's progress worth showing.
In the meantime - it's back to the easel!
Belle évolution artistique...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/fashion/15skin.html?ref=style
ReplyDeleteI thought you might find this interesting after the "landing strip" question. I'd be interested to hear (read) your thoughts on hair as well.